Originally Posted by shikamaru
For a long time when an attorney in a black robe explained that they were using common law, when challenged on that point, I believed he or she was a liar. So I am relating well to Jaro's point. Like I said, it was a newbie - a second year law student who put it truthfully to me, but she would not have if she had more experience - she would realize that was private intellectual property. She later understood that it is more prosecutorial to let the patriot nutjob flail about in ignorance of what common law is.
Here is a good example.
The Libel of Review contains a Certified Copy of this attachment.
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_969.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_970.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_971.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_972.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_973.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...l_6744_974.jpg
That is from 1861 where the Territory never properly formed before Congress adjourned for the War of Rebellion (Civil War). That tells a lot about history there, if you read a bit around here but my point is the last page linked. Look that over carefully and give it some thought, including why I even bothered to include it when describing trust structures that are thousands of years old.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Reply With Quote