Results 1 to 10 of 73

Thread: I received a 3176C 'frivolous letter' for 2013 1040x Amended return with LM demand

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    IMO, all of their contracts rightly presume the use of FRNs.

    It is OK for one to sign a W-4, just in case that presumption ever becomes ratified by one's future conduct/actions.

    However, I ensure that my conduct always rebuts that presumption by continually writing my disclaimer on my checks and deposits slips in this manner:

    Name:  deposit-slip-demand.jpg
Views: 826
Size:  7.9 KB


    This is how I got started, and it has worked successfully for 4 years now.

    If it works to rebut a tax-liability contract, why should we think that it does not work for all other contracts that are based on FRN-usage?
    Last edited by doug555; 04-26-15 at 03:04 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •